One is a finished, edit-ready intermediate; the other is a compressed RAW that hands you full control in post. The right choice depends on your camera and your workflow.
ProRes and Blackmagic RAW (BRAW) are two of the most popular professional recording formats, but they are not the same kind of thing. ProRes is a mature, edit-ready intermediate codec that bakes in your white balance and ISO at capture, giving you fast, predictable editing with plenty of grading headroom. BRAW is a clever compressed RAW format that defers debayering and key creative decisions to post, so you can change white balance, ISO, and more after the shoot with minimal quality cost. There is also Apple ProRes RAW, which sits closer to BRAW conceptually. Choosing between them is partly a camera decision, since not every body records both, and partly a workflow decision about how much control you want versus how fast you want to cut. This guide breaks down flexibility, file size, grading latitude, editing performance, and compatibility so you can record in the right format for your project.
ProRes (including ProRes 422, 422 HQ, and 4444) is an intermediate codec. It records a debayered, processed image with your white balance, ISO, and color profile applied at capture. The file is large but edit-ready: it decodes fast, plays smoothly on modest hardware, and behaves predictably. You still grade it, especially if you shot a log profile, but the fundamental color decisions are baked in.
BRAW is a partially processed RAW format. Blackmagic does some debayering and noise handling in-camera to keep file sizes manageable, then stores the sensor data so that white balance, ISO, exposure, and tint remain fully adjustable in post without quality loss. It gives you RAW-level control at file sizes closer to a high-end intermediate codec.
Apple ProRes RAW is Apple's RAW format, conceptually similar to BRAW in that it preserves sensor data for post-production flexibility. Historically it was tied to Final Cut Pro and external recorders, though software support has broadened. For this comparison, the core decision is processed-and-ready (ProRes) versus flexible RAW (BRAW).
BRAW's headline advantage is post-production flexibility. Because it stores RAW sensor data, you can change white balance, ISO, and tint after the fact as if you were adjusting them in camera, and recover highlight and shadow detail aggressively. For tricky mixed-lighting shoots or jobs where you cannot lock color on set, that latitude is a genuine safety net.
ProRes still grades well, especially when you shoot a log profile that preserves dynamic range, but your white balance and ISO are baked in. You are color-correcting a finished image rather than reinterpreting RAW data, so the latitude, while ample for most work, is narrower than BRAW's. For controlled productions where color is locked on set, that limitation rarely bites.
On noise, the formats behave differently. BRAW applies some in-camera processing that removes part of the noise along with a little fine detail, producing a slightly cleaner file. ProRes RAW, by contrast, applies no noise reduction, preserving more detail within the noise itself. Neither is strictly better; it depends on whether you prefer a cleaner starting point or maximum raw detail to manage yourself.
Both formats are storage-hungry compared to delivery codecs like H.264 or H.265, so plan for fast media and large drives either way. The exact sizes depend heavily on the camera, resolution, frame rate, and the quality or compression tier you select.
BRAW's big strength is selectable compression. You can choose constant-quality or constant-bitrate ratios (for example 3:1 up to 12:1 and beyond) to dial file size against quality, which makes it efficient for long-form and run-and-gun work. In many comparisons BRAW lands at a notably lower bitrate than RAW alternatives for similar perceived quality.
ProRes also offers tiers, from the lighter ProRes 422 LT and 422 up to the heavier 422 HQ and 4444, letting you trade size for fidelity. As an intermediate codec it is predictable and universally supported, but at the higher tiers it can produce larger files than a well-compressed BRAW for comparable results. If storage and bitrate efficiency are priorities, BRAW's compression flexibility is a real advantage.
ProRes is the compatibility king. It plays natively and smoothly across Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, Avid, and effectively every professional tool, on modest hardware. Because the image is already processed, timelines are responsive and you rarely need proxies. For fast-turnaround and collaborative workflows where assets move between editors and apps, ProRes is the safe, frictionless choice.
BRAW is most at home in DaVinci Resolve, where Blackmagic's own tools give it first-class, real-time performance and full access to its RAW controls. It is supported elsewhere too, but the experience is best in Resolve, which is a natural fit for color-led projects. BRAW decoding is efficient for a RAW format, so it edits more smoothly than many heavier RAW codecs.
A 2025 development worth noting: DaVinci Resolve broadened ProRes RAW support, letting Resolve users handle ProRes RAW from multiple sources while keeping BRAW workflows for Blackmagic cameras. The lines between ecosystems are blurring, but in practice ProRes remains the most universally painless, while BRAW shines brightest inside Resolve.
Start with your camera, because it often decides for you. BRAW is recorded natively by Blackmagic cameras and select third-party recorders. ProRes is recorded internally by many cinema and mirrorless bodies (Blackmagic, Sony, Canon, and others) and by external recorders, making it the more widely available option across brands.
If your priority is maximum control, especially the ability to fix white balance and ISO in post, and you cut in DaVinci Resolve, BRAW is the better recording format. If your priority is speed, broad app compatibility, predictable editing on modest hardware, and locked-on-set color, ProRes is the better choice. For RAW flexibility outside the Blackmagic ecosystem, ProRes RAW splits the difference where your camera and software support it. There is no universally correct answer; record in the format that matches your camera, your editor, and how much you want to decide on set versus in post.
| Apple ProRes | Blackmagic RAW (BRAW) | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Edit-ready intermediate codec | Compressed RAW (partial debayer) |
| White balance / ISO in post | Baked in at capture | Fully adjustable |
| Grading latitude | Ample (best with log) | Highest (RAW sensor data) |
| Noise handling | None applied (ProRes RAW); processed look (ProRes) | Some in-camera NR, slightly cleaner |
| Compression control | Tiers: LT / 422 / HQ / 4444 | Selectable ratios (e.g. 3:1 to 12:1+) |
| File size efficiency | Larger at high tiers | Often more efficient for similar quality |
| Editing performance | Smooth everywhere, low hardware demand | Best in Resolve, efficient for RAW |
| Software compatibility | Universal (FCP, Premiere, Resolve, Avid) | Best in DaVinci Resolve |
| Camera support | Wide (many brands, internal + external) | Blackmagic + select recorders |
| Proxies needed | Rarely | Rarely (efficient decode) |
| Best workflow | Fast-turnaround, collaborative, color locked on set | Color-led, Resolve, flexible post |
Record in BRAW when you want maximum post-production control, especially the ability to change white balance and ISO after the shoot, and when you cut in DaVinci Resolve; it pairs RAW flexibility with efficient, selectable compression. Record in ProRes when you want broad compatibility, fast and predictable editing on modest hardware, and you can lock color on set. Your camera often makes the call, since BRAW is Blackmagic-centric while ProRes is everywhere. For RAW outside the Blackmagic world, ProRes RAW bridges the gap where supported.
Hand the footage to our editors — color grading services, done to a professional standard.
Hand the footage to our editors — music video editing, done to a professional standard.
Hand the footage to our editors — concert video editing, done to a professional standard.
Neither is universally better; they solve different problems. BRAW gives you RAW-level control to change white balance and ISO in post and grades best in DaVinci Resolve. ProRes is a finished, edit-ready codec that plays smoothly everywhere on modest hardware. Choose BRAW for flexibility and Resolve workflows, ProRes for speed and broad compatibility.
Regular ProRes is a processed intermediate with white balance and ISO baked in. ProRes RAW stores sensor data so those decisions stay adjustable in post, making it conceptually similar to BRAW rather than to standard ProRes. ProRes RAW historically tied to Final Cut and external recorders, though DaVinci Resolve broadened support in 2025.
It depends on the tier you pick, but BRAW's selectable compression ratios often make it more storage-efficient for a given perceived quality, while still preserving RAW flexibility. ProRes is predictable but can produce larger files at its higher tiers like 422 HQ and 4444. Both are far larger than delivery codecs, so plan for fast, high-capacity media either way.
Yes, BRAW has support in other applications, but the experience is best in DaVinci Resolve, where Blackmagic's native tools give real-time performance and full RAW control. If your team works across multiple apps or hands assets between editors, ProRes is the more frictionless format because it is universally supported.
Check your camera first, because it often decides for you. BRAW is recorded by Blackmagic cameras and select third-party recorders. ProRes is recorded internally by many cinema and mirrorless bodies across brands and by external recorders. If your camera only outputs one of them, that is your answer; if it does both, choose by workflow.
The wrong card drops frames mid-take. Here is how to match SD or CFexpress to your camera's bitrate, and which cards actually sustain the write speeds they claim.
A working cinematographer's guide to picking a filmmaking camera at any budget, from sub-$2,000 starters to true cinema bodies.
Same E-mount, same S-Cinetone, very different cameras. One is a 33MP hybrid; the other is a 12MP cinema machine built to never overheat.
The Color page is why professionals choose Resolve. Here is how to actually use the nodes, wheels, and scopes to grade real footage.
Color grading is where a music video stops looking shot and starts looking intentional — here is how to do it right from log to export.
Once the footage is in the can, Studio432 turns it into something worth posting — concert films, music videos, gaming, vlogs and short-form, edited remote and worldwide. Send the footage, get a quote by email.
Get it edited →